Another Omar

I'm the first to admit I'm a bit confused about the Omar Khadr trial. Let me start by saying I have very little sympathy for the Khadrs. There is no question their father was knowingly involved in the financing of terrorism. Here's what we know, which I don't believe is being disputed - The US government sent US soldiers to Afghanistan to remove the Taliban regime by force and to capture or kill as many members of Al-Qaeda as possible, as the primary response to September 11 attacks. There's pretty good reasons to believe that this is exactly the response Osama Bin Laden was hoping 9/11 would provoke. Either way, a lot of people make the mistake of confusing al-Qaeda, the terrorist organization with the Taliban, the government of Afghanistan, but in this case it doesn't really matter. The Khadrs were members of Al-Qaeda. They were part of a terrorist organization. So I have no problem with US forces killing Ahmed Said Khadr, he's about as fair game as Ayman al-Zawahri or Bin Laden himself. I think we can agree on that. Honestly, in the heat of the battlefield, I don't even have a problem with shooting and killing a fifteen year old boy. These things happen; its an unfortunate fact of war. But in Omar's case things get a bit fuzzy especially with the release of this today -

It has long been assumed by many that Mr. Khadr was the only combatant alive, and so must have been the one who threw the grenade. But the first U.S. service member on the scene described coming across another living fighter, and shooting him dead with a bullet to the head, before finding the wounded Mr. Khadr and shooting him twice in the back but not killing him.

The revelations, mistakenly released in never-before-seen documents, came during a military tribunal hearing for Mr. Khadr yesterday at the U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay.

Documents that were supposed to be censored in their entirety were accidentally handed out to reporters in the courtroom, taking both defence and prosecution lawyers by surprise.

Somebody's gonna get shot in the face over letting that dossier split out.

Omar was fifteen years old at the time and he didn't exactly choose to live as a jihadist in Afghanistan. Maybe he's a sociopathic killer - I don't know but he was fifteen years old. And he's been held in Guantanamo for over five years because he killed a US soldier. A US soldier who was sent to Afghanistan to kill him and his kind. Now we find out that not only is it possible he didn't throw the grenade that killed the soldier but another soldier shot him in the back. Twice. So I'm a bit confused - isn't Omar Khadr supposed to be trying to kill American soldiers? Isn't that how war works? How does this constitute a "war crime"? It seems that "unlawful combatant" also means its "unlawful" for you to actually participate in a "combatant" role i.e. fighting back. Providing material support for a terrorist organization make him a criminal. A common criminal not a war criminal but, of course, if he was a criminal he'd be entitled a regular trial.

And don't even get me started on how the inmates at Guantanamo are the "worst of the worst" yet the US has "discharged" two thirds of the estimated 750 inmates since 2002 without charges. Three people have been charged. Three.